About your Search

20130202
20130210
Search Results 0 to 2 of about 3 (some duplicates have been removed)
fiber access. so google in kansas city is having real trouble getting access to sports content because time warner cable, the local monopoly player there, controls that sports content. so google or any other competitive fiber provider has to enter two markets at once. one market to provide the transport, the fiber, and then also the programming market. and making programming more expensive is yet another barrier to entry. and comcast can carry that out now. >> so what should the f.c.c. do about that? >> this is a moment when we have to separate out content from conduit. it should not be possible for a local cable actor or any distributor to withhold programming based on volume. that's what's going on. the programmers say, "we'll sell to comcast cheaply 'cause they're big. but if you're an upstart we're going to charge you three to four times what comcast is paying for the same programming." that should not be legal. everybody should get access to the same stuff at the same price and they should be announced prices. >> what about the argument that in this modern world there are certain
Search Results 0 to 2 of about 3 (some duplicates have been removed)

Terms of Use (10 Mar 2001)